<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Soul To Soul	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=soul-to-soul</link>
	<description>All about Jessica and Tim</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2022 07:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Timbo		</title>
		<link>https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/#comment-51</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlux.guru/?p=297#comment-51</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/#comment-47&quot;&gt;Jessica Luxmoore&lt;/a&gt;.

I understand the observations were descriptive rather than flattery. Nonetheless, they are flattering descriptions and, as they are descriptions of my energy - me? - that is why I say they are heady. Who doesn&#039;t like to hear that they are a bunch of good things. Or my spirit is, at least.

For someone who receives unfavourable readings, an understandable reaction would be to discount it as nonsense. (&quot;I never believed in all that stuff anyway.&quot;) Immediate rejection.
For someone who receives favourable readings, an opposite reaction would be understandable. (&quot;Wow. I never knew. Tell me more.&quot;) Immediate acceptance.
Both reactions are shallow, but I think people can be seduced by flattery, don&#039;t you?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/#comment-47">Jessica Luxmoore</a>.</p>
<p>I understand the observations were descriptive rather than flattery. Nonetheless, they are flattering descriptions and, as they are descriptions of my energy &#8211; me? &#8211; that is why I say they are heady. Who doesn&#8217;t like to hear that they are a bunch of good things. Or my spirit is, at least.</p>
<p>For someone who receives unfavourable readings, an understandable reaction would be to discount it as nonsense. (&#8220;I never believed in all that stuff anyway.&#8221;) Immediate rejection.<br />
For someone who receives favourable readings, an opposite reaction would be understandable. (&#8220;Wow. I never knew. Tell me more.&#8221;) Immediate acceptance.<br />
Both reactions are shallow, but I think people can be seduced by flattery, don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jessica Luxmoore		</title>
		<link>https://jlux.guru/soul-to-soul/#comment-47</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica Luxmoore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlux.guru/?p=297#comment-47</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am gentle, sensitive and strong. I am in command. My energy – Uuska – possesses a gentle power, a knowing, a connection - yes! 

This is your Energy, it’s not flattery it’s observation. 

When Shamanka first meets you, you are hesitant but amused - you would be ! 

Shamanka doesn’t hesitate to pull punches, I’ve read some harsh words about others - Milly, Sue - both had readings. 

So it’s not said to flatter. You’re wonderful- maybe I need to be the one telling you - maybe that’s why you regularly tell me ..... ? Mmm.

Perfect, perfect song, my love. X]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am gentle, sensitive and strong. I am in command. My energy – Uuska – possesses a gentle power, a knowing, a connection &#8211; yes! </p>
<p>This is your Energy, it’s not flattery it’s observation. </p>
<p>When Shamanka first meets you, you are hesitant but amused &#8211; you would be ! </p>
<p>Shamanka doesn’t hesitate to pull punches, I’ve read some harsh words about others &#8211; Milly, Sue &#8211; both had readings. </p>
<p>So it’s not said to flatter. You’re wonderful- maybe I need to be the one telling you &#8211; maybe that’s why you regularly tell me &#8230;.. ? Mmm.</p>
<p>Perfect, perfect song, my love. X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
